Work, for so many, is neither productive nor lucrative; alienation from the means of production, from our own labour and our own sense of productiveness and meaning, is crippling. It’s a wonder there is any optimism in Millie at all – that she imagines gaining secure and full-time work, getting fit, cleaning her apartment, looking put-together (a ‘new me’) is a feat of extraordinary delusion and willpower. The surprising thing in her situation is not her malaise (surely the only rational response to such circumstances) but rather the fact that the innate human drive to survive somehow endures, compelling her every day out of her bed and into the office to shred documents and clip papers into packets before returning home to eat junk food, retire to bed and do it all again.
Moshfegh’s narrator is similarly disenchanted with life under capitalism, though her class privilege and situation on the lucky side of intergenerational inequality allows her to take a different course of action. Similarly depressive and disconnected, the narrator chooses to sleep for an entire year, to completely disengage from society, from culture (except Whoopi Goldberg movies), politics and the economy and the city around her – to become a blank slate. To do this, she makes use of a script-happy therapist more than willing to assist her with all manner of prescription psychopharmaceuticals, which are, after all, today’s coping mechanism of choice. That our narrator here chooses to use these drugs to sleep for a year is but an exaggeration of what the rest of us – who must continue on with jobs and grocery shopping and other responsibilities – do in a more restrained manner: pop pills to get by, to drag ourselves from one day to the next, to forget that we hate who we are and have no sense of meaning attached to what we do.
It’s a wonder there is any optimism in Millie at all – that she imagines a ‘new me’ is a feat of extraordinary delusion and willpower.
Moshfegh’s narrator’s blithe acceptance of a level of privilege allows her to write off an entire year of her life, is demonstrative of a world in which wealth and privilege exist to be squandered by those who have it. Conversely for Millie, that wealth and privilege will be forever out of reach is a given. Millie’s optimism is not that she will pull herself up by her bootstraps to live out the American Dream, but that perhaps one day she will have the security of not living day-to-day, and maybe even enjoy a tiny pay rise. This is a life in which getting paid $18 an hour, rather than $12, could drastically alter one’s life trajectory. Almost laughable, except that the $6 pay rise will sit forever just out of Millie’s grasp.
*
Any millennial worth their salt – and for that matter anyone online today – will know that earnestness is, in our present moment, a virtue to be scorned. Cynicism and scepticism are the values of the day. And why not be cynical? To be earnest in late capitalism is, surely, to not be paying attention. At every turn, we are encouraged to see ourselves as independent enterprises, competing with those around us for a piece of an ever-shrinking pie. Precarious work, bullshit jobs, a seemingly permanent housing crisis, a planet in a death spiral, a team of self-serving buffoons leading the world’s most powerful nations. What on earth is there to be earnest about?
In these characters, earnestness is a poison and a weakness. Millie’s pathetic attempts at self-reinvention are to be mocked by the reader because they are made in earnest. Moshfegh’s narrator is scornful of effort, disdainful of others’ attempts to look good, be good, or even to feel anything at all. The only truly earnest character in either novel is Reva, our slothful narrator’s best friend. Reva is sweet, self-conscious, striving. Her concern for Moshfegh’s narrator, as well as her eagerness to please, are dismissed by the narrator as ridiculous and absurd because she is genuine, heartfelt, lacking in the cynicism required to truly thrive in this moment.

